All problems

IMO 2026 · Problem 4

Frozen · pending review·Day 2·domain pending·Evidence I0 - Unscoped
Official-solution dependence: None·Official solution viewed: NO
Proof audit: NOT-STARTED·Internal prior-solution exposure: YES

Legacy solution manuscript

A complete solution write-up produced earlier in the project. Preserved here in full; not an official IMO solution and not yet independently audited.

IMO2026_Day2_Problem4.pdfDownload PDF
created 2026-07-16level: L4-candidate (human-checkable write-up)audit: AUDIT-PENDINGsha256:2f78c72a43e9

Independent HIVE-IMO X manuscript. Not an official IMO solution, and not independently verified under the new pipeline.

Official problem

Statement captured from the official source but not yet passed. Independent English semantic review (Sol, V2) and Human Vietnamese review (V3) are pending; the gate is not yet PASS-OFFICIAL-FREEZE.

Shan-Yu and Mulan are playing a game. Let θ\theta be an angle with 0<θ<1800^\circ<\theta<180^\circ known to both players. Initially, Shan-Yu makes a paper triangle T\mathcal{T} with measurements of his choice. Then, they repeatedly perform the following steps:

  • If T\mathcal{T} has at least one angle measuring exactly θ\theta, then the game stops and Mulan wins.
  • Otherwise, Mulan chooses a point PP on the perimeter of T\mathcal{T}, different from its three vertices. She then makes a straight cut from PP to the opposite vertex of T\mathcal{T}, splitting it into two triangles.
  • Shan-Yu discards one of the two triangles. The remaining triangle becomes the new T\mathcal{T}.

For which real values of θ\theta can Mulan guarantee her victory in finitely many steps, no matter how Shan-Yu plays?

official source ↗frozen 2026-07-21sha256:cbe3015874

Vietnamese translation

Faithful literal draft by Fable, pending Human review (proper names kept in original form).

Shan-Yu và Mulan chơi một trò chơi. Cho θ\theta là một góc với 0<θ<1800^\circ<\theta<180^\circ mà cả hai người chơi đều biết. Ban đầu, Shan-Yu làm một tam giác bằng giấy T\mathcal{T} với các số đo tùy ý theo lựa chọn của mình. Sau đó, họ lặp lại các bước sau:

  • Nếu T\mathcal{T} có ít nhất một góc bằng đúng θ\theta, thì trò chơi dừng lại và Mulan thắng.
  • Ngược lại, Mulan chọn một điểm PP trên chu vi của T\mathcal{T}, khác ba đỉnh của nó. Sau đó cô cắt thẳng từ PP đến đỉnh đối diện của T\mathcal{T}, chia nó thành hai tam giác.
  • Shan-Yu bỏ đi một trong hai tam giác. Tam giác còn lại trở thành T\mathcal{T} mới.

Với những giá trị thực nào của θ\theta thì Mulan có thể bảo đảm chiến thắng của mình sau hữu hạn bước, bất kể Shan-Yu chơi thế nào?

What the problem asks

A short plain-language explanation is written during S1–S3, after independent human and AI reads. S0 freezes the statement only - no interpretation yet.

Human × AI contribution matrix

Attribution per stage. Final approval is always human-led and verified independently.

ContributionHumanSolFableIndependent verifier
Problem interpretation----
Core idea----
Lemma discovery----
Counterexample search----
Proof writing----
Formal checking----
Final approval----
Contribution attribution is recorded stage by stage; no roles are assigned until work begins.

Swipe horizontally to see all columns →

Audit preparation (S0-R)

The manuscript has been reconciled into a verifier-ready dossier: statement binding, section map, and a proof-obligation skeleton. No obligation has been verified.

state: RECONCILEDstatement: MATCHproof obligations: 5 (3 load-bearing)audited: 0/5

Every obligation is marked CLAIMED (asserted by the manuscript), never VERIFIED. Independent audit by an unexposed verifier has not started.

Timeline · S0–S14

  1. S0Official problem freeze
    HUMAN · Pending: Human V3 translation review + contamination attestation.AI · Fable froze the official statement, produced normalized EN + VI draft, source record, contamination ledger and SHA-256 manifest. Sol V2 semantic review pending. No solving.
  2. S1Human blind read
    Not started.
  3. S2AI independent read
    Not started.
  4. S3Contrastive merge
    Not started.
  5. S4Formal decomposition
    Not started.
  6. S5Small-domain reconnaissance
    Not started.
  7. S6Route tournament
    Not started.
  8. S7Lemma forge
    Not started.
  9. S8Candidate proof assembly
    Not started.
  10. S9Adversarial review
    Not started.
  11. S10Independent reconstruction
    Not started.
  12. S11Human proof rewrite
    Not started.
  13. S12Independent / formal verification
    Not started.
  14. S13Official-solution comparison
    Not started.
  15. S14Publication and postmortem
    Not started.

Route map

Up to three main routes survive the tournament at S6.

No routes proposed yet.

Failed attempts

Failed routes and rejected proofs are kept permanently, never deleted.

None recorded yet.

Key lemmas

Lemmas appear here once forged at S7, each with an exact statement and an evidence class.

Proof - compact

Written at S11 in natural olympiad style, scorable 0–7 per step. Not yet available.

Proof - annotated

The annotated proof with justifications and dependencies is not yet available.

Independent verification

Required before the status VERIFIED-INDEPENDENT may be shown.

No independent verification has been performed. Status will not reach VERIFIED-INDEPENDENT until an olympiad expert, an independent model family, or a formal proof (Lean/Isabelle/Coq) confirms the proof.

Official-solution comparison

Official solution viewed after proof freeze: NO
Official solution dependence: NONE

A full comparison (core idea, length, naturalness, differences) runs at S13, only after the proof is frozen.

Artifact downloads

Every file is published with a SHA-256 checksum.

MANIFEST sha256: 12e60de0a27214abe20e88ca3944771ab9617b992f490901e73fbb838dae9c2d

Revision history

  1. 21/07/2026Record initialized
    Ledger created at status FROZEN-PENDING-REVIEW. No mathematical progress recorded yet.

HIVE-IMO X is an independent research project. Not affiliated with or sponsored by the International Mathematical Olympiad. Problem texts belong to their authors. Human Owner Lâm Nguyễn holds academic responsibility; Sol and Fable are AI collaborators, not accountable authors.